Rush - A Farewell To Kings

[Slim]

Where to start?

This was my first 'new' Rush album - the first one to be released after I was indoctrinated to the cause, and I still vividly remember the anticipation before it hit the shops in 1977. On the day it was released, I literally ran out of my final class of the afternoon, and ten minutes later I had a copy in my trembling hands. I ran all the way home, too. I was so excited, and proud, finally to be part of a new Rush album from the very beginning. In those days my devotion to Rush was more or less an obsession. It was like a religion to me, still the closest I've ever come to religion thankfully.

I ran upstairs, closed the bedroom door. Somehow my shaking hand managed to apply the stylus to the groove and I sat down to listen to Rush's latest gift to humankind.

Oh dear. Oh dear, oh dear.

My anticipation and excitement was replaced with massive disappointment. I tried to like it - I was almost desperate to like it - but, I didn't (and I still don't). In the weeks following its release, I would wake up each morning, remember A Farewell To Kings, then feel sick and disheartened. I played it over and over and over again, hoping that I would grow to love it. No chance.

I have never quite forgiven Rush for A Farewell To Kings. It was a cruel blow.

It's not quite a stinker, but it's most certainly a dud. The songs are generally weak and at times it's unedifyingly pompous. More importantly, it has none of the purity of form, the passion or the finely-crafted edge of its magnificent predecessor - where 2112 was sharp, graceful, dramatic, assured, A Farewell To Kings is blunt, awkward and overblown. I admire their eagerness to develop their sound for the opening page of 'chapter two', but I think that - at least as far as this album is concerned - perhaps they were too ambitious. It's an experiment that emphatically failed.

Xanadu, I quite like. Admittedly, it takes what seems like half an hour to get going, but the guitar work is particularly strong, and it's a very imaginative piece. But even this suffers from an extended, pointless self-indulgent instrumental section. The bit where Alex and Geddy start practicing their scales in the middle - what's that all about? It's probably a five minute tune, padded out by mindless repetition.

But Cygnus X-1 - oh please. Indigestible chunks of thoughtless heavy metal riffola clash with sequences of overlong, repetitive guitar noodling that seem to have been lifted from an entirely different song. I wouldn't go as far as Neil Peart, who is reported to have said years later "I hate that song", but I certainly don't like it. It still beggars belief that the band who came up with 2112 should have been putting out nonsense like this a mere eighteen months later.

The shorter songs often work better, but are not particularly strong. Closer to The Heart is a perfectly inoffensive but ultimately not very stimulating pop-rock tune. The title track has a lovely acoustic guitar intro, then turns into something very jerky and brash indeed, with a wholly inappropriate instrumental section where Lifeson delivers a savage heavy metal solo while Geddy twangs away, pointlessly jumping octaves on a single note. I still wince when I hear the wanky major key lead guitar fills that pipe up every now and then in this track. Cinderella Man has a boring folk-rock verse, a nice chorus and (this time) a lovely, inventive funky instrumental break - but ultimately, it fails to convince.

More generally, Peart's lyrics - take "we turned our gaze from the castles in the distance" for example - are often as pompous and inappropriate as his selection of attire for the inner sleeve photo. And the production seems so very 'in your face', mostly graceless and crude instead of atmospheric.

I can't deny that A Farewell To Kings has a certain naive, inelegant charm in places, and the passing years have afforded it a patina of nostalgia that has made it slightly more palatable in retrospect. There are some good bits. There are some REALLY good bits - the lovely nylon-strung intro to the title track, Alex's lovely harmonic intro to Xanadu (although it gets a bit tedious after the first half-hour), its riff and its expressive guitar solo (it's actually a Blues solo, I wonder if Alex would have chosen the same approach a few years later), Cinderella Man's catchy, affecting chorus - but these are the icing on a tasteless and haphazardly thrown-together cake.

An interesting album, maybe. But not a very good one. It just doesn't 'gel'. It should probably have been an EP. Or a single.

Happily, Rush's next recording project brought forth an album which was a stunning artistic achievement, every bit a worthy successor to 2112, and which rekindled my faith in Rush to a bright, blazing flame.

But the copy-book was emphatically blotted. There's simply no denying that, in the late summer of 1977, Rush knocked out a clunker.

Still - it wouldn't be the last time.

[The Picnic Wasp]

My only criticism of this album is that Madrigal is too short.

[Thenop]

FtK to me is like listening to Caress of Steel before 2112. They had to make tis one to be able to create Hemispheres. To me it sounds like a logical step almost.
Having said that, for me it was not a new release, rather something I discovered working my way backward through the catalogue in the 80's. It might have been different had I encoutered it like you did Slim.

Side 1 resonates significantly more than side 2 for me though. The title track and especially Xanadu I hold quite dear. Never been a fan of CttH, it's the whole balladry / pop side of the band I am not too fond of. Cinderella Man and Madrigal don't do much for me either but I kind of like Cygnus even if it is pompous and overblown.

There's no question it's the least interesting of the 4 LP run they did up to Moving Pictures, but a necessary one to my ears, to get where they were going.

[pxr5]

It's my favourite Rush album, peaking just above Hemispheres for me. There isn't one part of it I dislike. Slim, maybe your expectation was too high and when you heard it for the first time it left you unfulfilled and that feeling has stuck with you ever since. I was in awe of it when I first played it. The opener is one of my top Rush tracks and I absolutely love Xanadu and Cygnus X-1 (it always gives me goosepimples). This album and Hemispheres are Rush's best 2 albums and I've often wondered if it's because they felt pressured to complete them at a remote studio. I think it was Neal who said they all enjoyed making PeW and MP much more. And to me that shows, because as much as I love those 2 albums neither are as good as A Farewell to Kings or Hemispheres to me.

[Fishy]

First album I heard when my brother borrowed it from one of his pals.. but I never got round to buying if for myself til late 1980....
Always liked what was side 1... title track and Xanadu are top notch.. side 2 is a bit hit n miss.. CTTH.. quite happy if I never heard it again.. Cinderella Man got it back on track .. Madrigal I never quite understood what it was doing and CX1 was just plodding nonsense..